If you are wondering if this post will be due to some hot babe I met in
Australia by inferring from the title. You are wrong. If you are thinking of pork (which is babi in Bahasa Melayu) you are wrong as well.
The title is in reference to the protozoa Babesia. Slightly more information, Babesia of the phylum Apicomplexa , is a parasite is blood-borne, ixodid tick transmitted parasite.The definite host of this parasite is not a human but a mammal. Humans are considered an incidental host. Hey, you just cannot tell a tick who to bite can you? Now here is a sneak peek into the parasites life cycle. Firstly, the life cycle in a definite host. The tick takes a blood meal and it transfers the Sporozoites (cells that infect new hosts) into the host. The sporozoite infects the erythrocytes and develops into trophozoites. These trphozoites will then develop into merozoites, through binary fission, which reinitiates into the trphozoite replication cycle and/or develop into gametocytes. Another tick will bite the host and the gametocytes will be taken in and becomes a zygote inside the gut of the tick. The zygote will become a kinete and this phase allows the parasitic organism to travel around the tick. Once the kinete reaches the salivary gland, Sporozoites develop after which, this cycle continues.
In humans, we are dead end host. So after being bitten by an infected tick, the life cycle remains pretty much the same except for the fact that gametocytes are not formed. The merozoites will keep on reinitiating the trophozoite replication cycle within the host. Therefore, a human to human transmission route is only possible through blood transfusion.
Ok, I now fresh out of Geeki-ness and shall continue with my post proper.
Last year, I thought it will be the last time I had to have anything to do with Parasitology but, Parasitolgy is not done with me. Ok, I admit I was being daft when I made that statement last year. I’m in the field of microbiology and guess what, parasitology does spill over to the microbiology section so yup, sucks to be me for saying that. It’s not that I do not find it interesting, I did enjoy the parasitology module but it’s just that it is a “neglected” field and the hype wasn’t sustainable. Thinking practically, how am I going to survive in the field of parasitology if I’m back in Singapore?
Was attending a Australia Institute of Food Science Seminar last night. Ok, attending might be a tad bit wrong; it’s politically correct to say, assisted in hosting the seminar. The topic was on Parasitology in Food and the speaker introduced the pathogens as well as plausible control measures. My reflections after the seminar were primarily on the food science industry. Yes, it is true that you here reports of people getting down with diseases due to consumption of unsafe food. The agent responsible for this varies between Bacteria, Viruses, Fungi, Parasites, Toxins and Metals. Everybody is at risk of getting a food borne disease, no matter your diet. Therefore, there is a need to ensure that our food supply is safe; food science has become a necessary science.
It’s necessary science, but it is not exactly a ‘wow’ and ‘hyped up’ kind of science. Compare and contrast between this, Synthetic DNA and coliform count. Guess where the young and aspiring minds will want to be? While the current measures of safe guarding food are somewhat working, things do slip off the cracks. Microbes are not exactly dumb. Ok, maybe a single microbe will be dumb but in a community niche, they kick ass real hard and show us the power of evolution and ultimately, become a survivalist in this world. But with that being said, proper processing, cooking and handling of food can keep the bugs at bay. Only when we goof up, they go rouge. However, I feel that we should not be complacent on this. I personally feel that we know the bugs but we do not understand the bugs, there are biological pathways we have yet to discover, proteins left uncharacterised, genetic elements not totally understood. There is still reason to persist and fund research on these fronts.
This brings me to the point that not much funding is being channelled to these researches. Yes, I did mention that everybody is at risk but due to current food safety regimes, incidence of disease are not really that high and people are not really dropping dead. This is of course relative to killers with a non-communicable status like cancer and heart disease. Money tends to go to research on these areas based on the simple fact that people die more frequently due to these illnesses. It is indeed an altruistic move, I must say.
However, do not quote me on this but at the back of my head I got a feeling for another reason of funding research on killer illness is the want for people to live longer and have quality of health. While this is altruistic, I do view it as the world economy is sustained not by trade, but by people. So if people are falling left right and centre, in a way, the world economy will be shaken. We have all witness the fragility of it (world economy) because we are living in these times. GDP growth seems to be a measure that most countries proud themselves with, but the bottom line is still this, without people, you can forget about GDP growth. Without people, how do big pharma companies stay afloat?
Just to clear the air on the above paragraph if ya’ll got lost in my train of thoughts. Firstly, the research I’m talking about is Food Microbiology and food safety, not Microbiology in general. Secondly, the whole GDP muse thing, I’m not professing a socialist model. Like I said, it is just my personal musing.
It might seem that I’m partial to Food Microbiology. For the record, I am not partial to any sub-field within Microbiology yet, and I must emphasis the word yet. For the record, my stance is pretty much neutral and I’m at the phase where I’m absorbing what I can and as much as I can on various topics in Microbiology. My honours project is a testament to that, a nice blend of Food Microbiology, Microbial Genetics, Bacteriophage, and Bioinformatics and if time permits me, a glimpse into forensic microbiology (Epidemiology and ecology).
In closing, I saw that Orchard road was flooded yesterday. 2 thoughts came to mind. Firstly, was the thought of, “AWESOME, we got a flood? I thought it was mentioned somewhere in the year 1999 that Orchard road was not meant to flood?” The 2nd thought, which I agree is related to this post and the reason for me to blog and mention the parasitology seminar, was on the protozoa Blastocystis. I’m not really sure on all the parasites that Singapore faces but this is one that comes to mind, apart from Plasmodium. Blastocystis has been detected in Singapore since a long time ago and Research on 2008 with National University Hospital as its sample group show that among that population the most prevalent subtype of Blastocystis is the subtype III, which is a typical human to human transmission subtype. Singapore is an urbanized place hence, it’s not really surprising. It colonizes the gastrointestinal tract, meaning the route of entry is faecal oral. Therefore, with the flooding I’m sure faecal and sewerage water might be washed up as collateral event. So are you feeling safe wallowing in the flood water? Knowing that there might be parasites?
By the way, I left out possible examples of bacteria and other microbes that might be in faces and floating around the flood as well. I saw from pictures that Starbucks was submerged. Are you feeling safe to drink a coffee knowing that the place might possibly be contaminated with faecal material that may possibly carry microbial pathogens?
Be afraid. No, I’m kidding~ or am I?
Cheers!!